Note: text made in dashed border (like this) are comments made by me

Notice the bandwidth above, 582MB with an average of 37.7KB/visit. The purposely used a very light library for that reason. The Prototype library, for example, is 94KB by itself. So, just people downloading that off of my server would have cost almost 1.5GB of bandwidth.

Mostly US, that's not surprising

Hid the host names

I started noticing the hits to robots.txt in the middle of getting dugg and just made a fake one, hence some have many hits with no bandwidth usage

I wonder how it figures out the visit duration. I know browsers use the keep-alive directive when asking for a page, but at what point does it close the connection? And as you can see, the average of 122s means nothing since a majority of people visited under 30 seconds and there was a much smaller percentage visiting for much longer.

I really have to get rid of those pngs on the front page.

Note that this is only data where the hostname had specifically visited the digg url first. So people who found the page through search engines and the like aren't listed. So it looks like as a direct result of getting dugg I got an extra 120 hits to my blog (About 5 per hour).

Wow, look at Mac go.

Another wow, firefox at 77%! Looks like the digg crowd is definitely more on the tech side (surprise surprise).
Another interesting note is that most of the mac crowd doesn't use Safari.

Lots of interesting stuff here (Note that I only did referrer's with more than 10 hits).
No surprise that most people came from the story on digg itself. Next runner up is the direct link from the digg website
What did surprise me though is that stumbleupon gave more traffic than del.icio.us.

Most of these were because of a missing favicon.ico, which I updated in the middle of getting dugg